CO129-260 - Governor Sir Robinson Acting Governor O-Brien - 1893 [9-12] — Page 132

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

131

9.

"}

This is

very different from a slavish adhesion to the old traditional groove"

In

1890

"

the

"The high pressure work does not exist.

of when in England at the invitation Secretary of State I wrote a letter on the subject of alleged Overpressure; and I can only adhere to my statements then made that there is no systematic high pressure. The standard now required in the upper School would remain unaltered if Oxford Local Exam were abolished.

in

my

6. Segregation of

Nationalities.

I have given my reasons for this change Annual Report and in Minute & of my

letter N. 89. As usual Or Eitel's remarks are inaccurate. As I returned from England in October 1891 within six weeks of

the Annual Examination.

I need hardly state that it was

the non-Chinese classes were

in 1892 that bout formed.

I am unable to elicit any meaning from the phrase "a measure which directly contravenes all the traditions and elementary principles of Colonial Government"

I do not think that I am called upon to defend myself from the charge of exceeding my powers as Head Master, in forming classes in any manner whatever which I consider best-calculated to serve the interests of scholars.

Classes II. C. and I.C. are not

specially favoured, they nurseries for boys who are either dull or idle as compared

are on the other hand,

as compared with Chinese. The object of segregation is to afford them a fair chance, not to favour them unduly.

Any emulation between non-Chinese

of

the rarest

and Chinese in the same class is occurrence. From twelve years experience I

fact that the highest,

can state as a

th

non-Chinese or 10th place in a composite are at the bottom of

boy usually takes 8 class, while the majority

all classes. Now their presence acts as a stimulant, to energetic Chinese who know and feel themselves capable of easily excelling them is a problem to which no solution suggests itself.

By C.O.D. N° 22/84 the Head Master's

class he

* power to put subordinate masters to any pleases is clearly stated; a fortiori, the power | of assigning boys to certain classes is not denied. hem.

7. Staff.

"Whenever the Head Master or any Assistant master is absent acting temporary promotion

are made within the Dept. The half pay being

and

distributed all down the scale and an extra monitor appointed at the bottom of the list. This has been the practice for thirty years,

Rules is in conformity with the general of Service, and is believed the common practice

of other Departments.

Dr Eitel's argument

Cau

the

be shown

unsound by a Reductio ad absurdum. No change is made when the Head Master, nor when the Second Master, is absent and so on,

no staff at all is required.

The fallacy

ergo absolutely

3

Edit History

2026-05-27 04:32:25 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
131 9. "} This is very different from a slavish adhesion to the old traditional groove" In 1890 " the "The high pressure work does not exist. of when in England at the invitation Secretary of State I wrote a letter on the subject of alleged Overpressure; and I can only adhere to my statements then made that there is no systematic high pressure. The standard now required in the upper School would remain unaltered if Oxford Local Exam were abolished. in my 6. Segregation of Nationalities. I have given my reasons for this change Annual Report and in Minute & of my letter N. 89. As usual Or Eitel's remarks are inaccurate. As I returned from England in October 1891 within six weeks of the Annual Examination. I need hardly state that it was the non-Chinese classes were in 1892 that bout formed. I am unable to elicit any meaning from the phrase "a measure which directly contravenes all the traditions and elementary principles of Colonial Government" I do not think that I am called upon to defend myself from the charge of exceeding my powers as Head Master, in forming classes in any manner whatever which I consider best-calculated to serve the interests of scholars. Classes II. C. and I.C. are not specially favoured, they nurseries for boys who are either dull or idle as compared are on the other hand, as compared with Chinese. The object of segregation is to afford them a fair chance, not to favour them unduly. Any emulation between non-Chinese of the rarest and Chinese in the same class is occurrence. From twelve years experience I fact that the highest, can state as a th non-Chinese or 10th place in a composite are at the bottom of boy usually takes 8 class, while the majority all classes. Now their presence acts as a stimulant, to energetic Chinese who know and feel themselves capable of easily excelling them is a problem to which no solution suggests itself. By C.O.D. 22/84 the Head Master's class he * power to put subordinate masters to any pleases is clearly stated; a fortiori, the power | of assigning boys to certain classes is not denied. hem. 7. Staff. "Whenever the Head Master or any Assistant master is absent acting temporary promotion are made within the Dept. The half pay being and distributed all down the scale and an extra monitor appointed at the bottom of the list. This has been the practice for thirty years, Rules is in conformity with the general of Service, and is believed the common practice of other Departments. Dr Eitel's argument Cau the be shown unsound by a Reductio ad absurdum. No change is made when the Head Master, nor when the Second Master, is absent and so on, no staff at all is required. The fallacy ergo absolutely 3
Baseline (Original)
131 9. } This is very different from a slavish adhesion to the old traditional groove" In 1890 " the "The high pressure work does not exist. of when in England at the invitation Secretary of State I wrote a letter on the subject of alleged Overpressure; and I can only adhere to my statements then made that there is no systematic high pressure. The standard now required in the upper School would remain unaltered if Oxford Local Exam? were abolished. in my 6. Segregation of Nationalities. I have given my reasons for this change Annual Report and in Minute & of my letter N. 89. As usual Or Eitelsremarks are in- accuran. As I returned from England in October 1891 within six weeks of the Annual Examination. I need hardly state that it was the non. Chinese classes were in 1892 that bout formed. I am unable to clicit any meaning from the phrase " a measure which directly contravenes all the traditions and elementary principles of Colonial Government" I do not think that I am called upon to defend myself from the charge of exceeding my powers as Head Master, in forming classes in any manner whatever which I consider best- calculated to serve the interests of scholars. Classes II. C. and I.C. are not specially favoured, they nurseries for boys who are either dull or idle as compared are on the other hand, as compared with Chinese. The object of segre= gation is to afford them a fair chance, not to favour them un duly. Any emulation between non. Chines of the rarest and Chinese in the same class is occurrence. From twelve years experience I fact that the highest, can state as a th non-Chines or 10th place in a composite are at the bottom of boy usually takes 8 class, while the majority all classes. Now their presence acts as a stimulant, to energetic Chinese who know and feel themselves cupable of easily excelling them is a problem to which no solution suggests itself. By C.O.D. 22/84 the Head Madler's class he * power to put subordinato masters to any pleases is clearly stated; a fortior; the power | of assigning boys to certain classes is not denied. hem. 7. Staff. "Whenever the Head Master or any Assistant master is absent acting temporary promotion are made within the Dept. The half pay being and distributed all down ite scale and an extra monitor appointed at the bottom of the list. This has been the practice for thirty years, Rules is in confirmity with the general of Service, and is believe) the common practice of other Departments. Dr Eitel's argument Cau the be shown unsound by a Reductio ad absurdum. No change is made when the Head Masin, nor when the Second Master, is absent and so on, no staff at all is required. The fallacy ergo absolutely 3
2026-05-27 04:32:25 · Baseline
View content

131

9.

}

This is

very different from a slavish adhesion to the old traditional groove"

In

1890

"

the

"The high pressure work does not exist.

of when in England at the invitation Secretary of State I wrote a letter on the subject of alleged Overpressure; and I can only adhere to my statements then made that there is no systematic high pressure. The standard now required in the upper School would remain unaltered if Oxford Local Exam? were abolished.

in

my

6. Segregation of

Nationalities.

I have given my reasons for this change Annual Report and in Minute & of my

letter N. 89. As usual Or Eitelsremarks are in- accuran. As I returned from England in October

1891 within six weeks of

the Annual Examination.

I need hardly state that it was

the non. Chinese classes were

in 1892 that bout formed.

I am unable to clicit any meaning from the phrase " a measure which directly contravenes all the traditions and elementary principles of Colonial Government"

I do not think that I am called upon to defend myself from the charge of exceeding my powers as Head Master, in forming classes in any manner whatever which I consider best- calculated to serve the interests of scholars.

Classes II. C. and I.C. are not

specially favoured, they nurseries for boys who are either dull or idle as compared

are on the other hand,

as compared with Chinese. The object of segre= gation is to afford them a fair chance, not to favour them un

duly.

Any emulation between non. Chines

of

the rarest

and Chinese in the same class is occurrence. From twelve years experience I

fact that the highest,

can state as a

th

non-Chines or 10th place in a composite are at the bottom of

boy usually takes 8 class, while the majority

all classes. Now their presence acts as a stimulant, to energetic Chinese who know and feel themselves cupable of easily excelling them is a problem to which no solution suggests itself.

By C.O.D. N° 22/84 the Head Madler's

class he

* power to put subordinato masters to any pleases is clearly stated; a fortior; the power | of assigning boys to certain classes is not denied. hem.

7. Staff.

"Whenever the Head Master or any Assistant master is absent acting temporary promotion

are made within the Dept. The half pay being

and

distributed all down ite scale and an extra monitor appointed at the bottom of the list. This has been the practice for thirty years,

Rules is in confirmity with the general of Service, and is believe) the common practice

of other Departments.

Dr Eitel's argument

Cau

the

be shown

unsound by a Reductio ad absurdum. No change is made when the Head Masin, nor when the Second Master, is absent and so on,

no staff at all is required.

The fallacy

ergo absolutely

3

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.